0
selected
-
1.
Obesity: tackling the causes of the causes
The BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The British Medical Journal's international community of readers, authors, and editors.
2021
Abstract
This article analyses the responsibility of society systems’ structures towards the obesity epidemic - and how strongly a shift in the government responses is required to tackle this issue. Our “obesogenic” environments hinder the population from accessing healthy lifestyle and dietary patterns, while portraying obesity as an individual’s lack of personal willpower. By challenging the current views on obesity, this article proposes that new policies must be created to eliminate inequalities and to provide long-term solutions to the root causes of obesity, deeply entrenched across all aspects of society.
-
2.
Associations of dietary intake with cardiometabolic risk in a multi-ethnic cohort: a longitudinal analysis of the Determinants of Adolescence, now young Adults, Social well-being and Health (DASH) study.
Goff, LM, Huang, P, Silva, MJ, Bordoli, C, Enayat, EZ, Molaodi, OR, Cassidy, A, Maynard, M, Harding, S
The British journal of nutrition. 2019;121(9):1069-1079
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Ethnic inequalities in a wide range of chronic diseases are well documented. Poor dietary habits in childhood may contribute to higher rates of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension and Coronary Heart Disease (CHD). This study was a longitudinal follow-up of a subsample of the Determinants of Adolescent Social well-being and Health (DASH) study. The researchers aimed to identify dietary patterns and investigate their impact on chronic diseases in young adulthood. The study participants were 107 White British, 102 Black Caribbean, 132 Black African, 98 Indian, 111 Bangladeshi/Pakistani and 115 other/mixed ethnicity. Participants completed a 24-hour dietary intake recall and behaviour questionnaire at age 11-13yrs, and then again at age 21-23yrs. Body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, blood cholesterol and blood sugar were measured. The researchers found that dietary behaviours such as skipping breakfast and a low intake of fruit and vegetables were common. Rates of skipping breakfast and low fruit and vegetable consumption were highest among Black African and Black Caribbean participants. BMI and cholesterol levels in young adults were higher among those who regularly skipped breakfast. The researchers concluded that skipping breakfast is more common in certain ethnic groups and is associated with risk factors for chronic disease in young adults. They suggest that interventions to improve dietary habits could be targeted at specific population groups.
Abstract
Unfavourable dietary habits, such as skipping breakfast, are common among ethnic minority children and may contribute to inequalities in cardiometabolic disease. We conducted a longitudinal follow-up of a subsample of the UK multi-ethnic Determinants of Adolescent Social well-being and Health cohort, which represents the main UK ethnic groups and is now aged 21-23 years. We aimed to describe longitudinal patterns of dietary intake and investigate their impact on cardiometabolic risk in young adulthood. Participants completed a dietary behaviour questionnaire and a 24 h dietary intake recall; anthropometry, blood pressure, total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol and HbA1c were measured. The cohort consisted of 107 White British, 102 Black Caribbean, 132 Black African, 98 Indian, 111 Bangladeshi/Pakistani and 115 other/mixed ethnicity. Unhealthful dietary behaviours such as skipping breakfast and low intake of fruits and vegetables were common (56, 57 and 63 %, respectively). Rates of skipping breakfast and low fruit and vegetable consumption were highest among Black African and Black Caribbean participants. BMI and cholesterol levels at 21-23 years were higher among those who regularly skipped breakfast at 11-13 years (BMI 1·41 (95 % CI 0·57, 2·26), P=0·001; cholesterol 0·15 (95 % CI -0·01, 0·31), P=0·063) and at 21-23 years (BMI 1·05 (95 % CI 0·22, 1·89), P=0·014; cholesterol 0·22 (95 % CI 0·06, 0·37), P=0·007). Childhood breakfast skipping is more common in certain ethnic groups and is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in young adulthood. Our findings highlight the importance of targeting interventions to improve dietary behaviours such as breakfast consumption at specific population groups.
-
3.
The Obemat2.0 Study: A Clinical Trial of a Motivational Intervention for Childhood Obesity Treatment.
Luque, V, Feliu, A, Escribano, J, Ferré, N, Flores, G, Monné, R, Gutiérrez-Marín, D, Guillen, N, Muñoz-Hernando, J, Zaragoza-Jordana, M, et al
Nutrients. 2019;11(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Multicomponent interventions consisting of dietary modification, physical activity, behavioural therapy, and education have shown to improve body mass index, blood pressure, and lipids profile. The Obemat2.0 trail was designed and conducted to implement and to test the efficacy of a structured multicomponent motivational therapy to treat childhood obesity. The study is a randomised clustered clinical trial with a treatment on children with obesity lasting 12 months. The study had two arms: a control group and an intervention group. The recruitment started in June 2016 and the fieldwork is expected to end in June 2019. The study results will show whether a multicomponent program, including a bundle of motivational strategies conducted in primary centres by therapists with 12h of specific training could be more effective than usual care. Authors expect this clinical trial to open a window of opportunity to support professionals at the primary care level to treat childhood obesity.
Abstract
The primary aim of the Obemat2.0 trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a multicomponent motivational program for the treatment of childhood obesity, coordinated between primary care and hospital specialized services, compared to the usual intervention performed in primary care. This was a cluster randomized clinical trial conducted in Spain, with two intervention arms: motivational intervention group vs. usual care group (as control), including 167 participants in each. The motivational intervention consisted of motivational interviewing, educational materials, use of an eHealth physical activity monitor and three group-based sessions. The primary outcome was body mass index (BMI) z score increments before and after the 12 (+3) months of intervention. Secondary outcomes (pre-post intervention) were: adherence to treatment, waist circumference (cm), fat mass index (z score), fat free mass index (z score), total body water (kg), bone mineral density (z score), blood lipids profile, glucose metabolism, and psychosocial problems. Other assessments (pre and post-intervention) were: sociodemographic information, physical activity, sedentary activity, neuropsychological testing, perception of body image, quality of the diet, food frequency consumption and foods available at home. The results of this clinical trial could open a window of opportunity to support professionals at the primary care to treat childhood obesity. The clinicaltrials.gov identifier was NCT02889406.
-
4.
A Systematic Review of the Association of Skipping Breakfast with Weight and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Children and Adolescents. What Should We Better Investigate in the Future?
Monzani, A, Ricotti, R, Caputo, M, Solito, A, Archero, F, Bellone, S, Prodam, F
Nutrients. 2019;11(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Childhood obesity is a major public health issue across the world. The incidence of skipping breakfast among children and adolescent is rising. Numerous studies have shown a positive relationship between skipping breakfast and overweight or obesity. The aim of the study was to analyse the association of skipping breakfast with body weight and metabolic outcomes in the paediatric population. The study is a systemic review focusing on studies published in the last ten years. 39 articles were included for analysis and data from a total of 286,804 children and adolescents were reported. The systemic review demonstrates that children and adolescents who skip breakfast are at higher risk to be or become overweight or obese. Authors conclude that skipping breakfast may be a potential marker of lifestyle behaviours in children and adolescents that promote overweight or obesity and metabolic diseases.
Abstract
The incidence of skipping breakfast in pediatric subjects is rising, and a relationship with overweight (OW) and obesity (OB) has been shown. Associations with cardiovascular outcomes and skipping breakfast in adults have been reported. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the association of skipping breakfast with body weight and metabolic outcomes in the pediatric population. We searched relevant databases (2008⁻2018) and identified 56 articles, of which 39 were suitable to be included, basing on inclusion criteria (observational; defined breakfast skipping; weight and/or metabolic outcomes). Overall, 286,804 children and adolescents living in 33 countries were included. The definitions of OW/OB, skipping breakfast, and the nutrient assessment were highly heterogeneous. Confounding factors were reported infrequently. The prevalence of skipping breakfast ranged 10⁻30%, with an increasing trend in adolescents, mainly in girls. Skipping breakfast was associated with OW/OB in the 94.7% of the subjects. The lack of association was shown mainly in infants. Moreover, 16,130 subjects were investigated for cardiometabolic outcomes. Skipping breakfast was associated with a worse lipid profile, blood pressure levels, insulin-resistance, and metabolic syndrome. Five studies reported a lower quality dietary intake in breakfast skippers. This review supports skipping breakfast as an easy marker of the risk of OW/OB and metabolic diseases, whether or not it is directly involved in causality. We encourage intervention studies using standardized and generalizable indicators. Data on confounders, time of fasting, chronotypes, and nutrition quality are needed to establish the best practice for using it as a tool for assessing obesity risk.
-
5.
The views of young children in the UK about obesity, body size, shape and weight: a systematic review.
Rees, R, Oliver, K, Woodman, J, Thomas, J
BMC public health. 2011;11:188
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity in children is an increasing problem in Westernised societies; obese children are more at risk of poorer health in the short and long term. The aim of the study was to explore the views of children about the meanings of obesity and body size, shape or weight and their own experience of these issues. This systemic review looked at 28 studies done in UK, conducted after 1997 in children aged 4-11. The review’s findings suggest that for children, the health consequences of obesity seemed to be mostly irrelevant. Impact on their social lives was far more important. Also, despite often having healthy body sizes, children continue to dislike their own bodies. This review highlights the need to consider the social aspect of childhood obesity and that children’s perspectives should be used in the policy making process. The authors conclude that the studies did not fully represent children’s diversity and therefore higher quality research is needed to enable relevant interventions to be put into place.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are high levels of concern about childhood obesity, with obese children being at higher risk of poorer health both in the short and longer terms. Children's attitudes to, and beliefs about, their bodies have also raised concern. Children themselves have a stake in this debate; their perspectives on this issue can inform the ways in which interventions aim to work.This systematic review of qualitative and quantitative research aimed to explore the views of UK children about the meanings of obesity and body size, shape or weight and their own experiences of these issues. METHODS We conducted sensitive searches of electronic databases and specialist websites, and contacted experts. We included studies published from the start of 1997 which reported the perspectives of UK children aged 4-11 about obesity or body size, shape or weight, and which described key aspects of their methods. Included studies were coded and quality-assessed by two reviewers independently.Findings were synthesised in two analyses: i) an interpretive synthesis of findings from open-ended questions; and ii) an aggregative synthesis of findings from closed questions. We juxtaposed the findings from the two syntheses. The effect of excluding the lowest quality studies was explored. We also consulted young people to explore the credibility of a subset of findings. RESULTS We included 28 studies. Instead of a focus on health, children emphasised the social impact of body size, describing experiences and awareness of abuse and isolation for children with a greater weight. Body size was seen as under the individual's control and children attributed negative characteristics to overweight people. Children actively assessed their own size; many wished their bodies were different and some were anxious about their shape.Reviewers judged that children's engagement and participation in discussion had only rarely been supported in the included studies, and few study findings had depth or breadth. CONCLUSIONS Initiatives need to consider the social aspects of obesity, in particular unhelpful beliefs, attitudes and discriminatory behaviours around body size. Researchers and policy-makers should involve children actively and seek their views on appropriate forms of support around this issue.